“A link to a website which publishes photos without authorisation of the author does not in itself constitute a copyright infringement, an adviser to Europe's top court said on Thursday…” http://in.reuters.com/article/internet-copyright-eu-court-idINKCN0X40VE I had always assumed that this was how links were viewed (not infringing) and was a bit surprised to see the above being touted as news. I now wonder what U.S. courts have said on this topic. Anyone care to share on this?
“A link to a website which publishes photos without authorisation of the author does not in itself constitute a copyright infringement, an adviser to Europe's top court said on Thursday…”
http://in.reuters.com/article/internet-copyright-eu-court-idINKCN0X40VE
I had always assumed that this was how links were viewed (not infringing) and was a bit surprised to see the above being touted as news. I now wonder what U.S. courts have said on this topic. Anyone care to share on this?